SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 9

MADRAS HIGH COURT
string, string
Siva S. v. Genguraj and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [List of names]
For the Respondents: [List of names]

1. This petitioner coming on for orders upon perusing the petitioner and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. S. Siva Party inperson for the petitioner and of Mr. M. Babumuthumeeran Additional Pubic Prosecutor on behalf of the respondent 5, Mr. N. Duraisamy Legal Aid Counsel for R1 to R 4, the Court made the following order.
'Party inperson appeared before this Court today and submitted that there are four accused in this case and they have been granted the relief of anticipatory bail by this Court by order dated 23/06/2006 for the alleged offence under S.342, 323, 324, and 307 IPC in Cri. No. 623/2006 on the file of PalliIkaranai Police Station, Chennai.'

2. It is submitted that the first accused in this case, going on giving trouble and threat to the life of the petitioner and he is not allowing the petitioner to give the evidence in this case peacefully. It is further submitted that the respondent police also not implicated the other accused and as such, the petitioner/party inperson represented before this Court that he is aggrieved on that ground also. In view of submissions the petitioner seeks the relief of cancelling the anticipatory bail.

3. Mr. N. Duraisamy, the learned counsel






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top