Back
MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. Manikumar, J
Chandrasekhar T. v. State and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial agreement and dispute details regarding advance payment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. allegations of fraudulent representation by the petitioner. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments against the allegations, emphasizing civil nature. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. counterarguments asserting the validity of the complaint. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. framework for establishing cheating under ipc. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 24) |
| 6. final ruling quashing the fir based on lack of evidence. (Para 25 , 26) |
1. By consent of both sides, the matter is taken up for final hearing. The petition is filed seeking a direction to call for the records in Cr.No.735 of 2006 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
The petitioner was carrying on the business in Real Estate under the name and style of Nature Development Company. One of their projects relates to Farm House Plots to be developed in and around Sholinganallur village, Tamabram Taluk. The petitioner had arrangements with various land owners when the land value was Rs.7 lakhs per plot measuring about 4 grounds. One Sri G. Balachander, IAS approached the petitioner and represented that some of IAS officers
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
