MADRAS HIGH COURT
Judge, J
V. Krishnaveni – Appellant
Versus
A. Gopalakrishnan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims of domestic violence and rights to shared household. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's findings on jurisdiction and merits of petitions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. final ruling affirming the dismissal of the appeal. (Para 7 , 8) |
1. There is no representation for the petitioner. It is not the first time the revision petitioner has left the matter without representation. As such, this Court deems it appropriate to pass an order after going through the records and after hearing the submissions made on behalf of the respondent.
2. The revision petitioner (V. Krishnaveni) is the mother of Rajkumar, the first respondent herein. A. Gopalakrishnan, the 2nd respondent is the father - in - law of Rajkumar. The revision petitioner is a widow. Claiming that she was living in the residential house bearing door No. 6, Nagalingam Pillai Street, Thiruchuli Road, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District which was purchased by her husband in 1991; that her husband died on 22/02/2008 and that the first respondent, who got the property by virtue of a gift deed executed by her husband failed to maintain the revision petitioner and on the other hand, has driven her out of the said house, preferred a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.