SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 3

MADRAS HIGH COURT
D. MURUGESAN, *K. K. SASIDHARAN, JJ.
Indian Bank v. Poonachi Estate and Others


Table of Content
1. facts leading to the initial decree. (Para 2 , 4 , 5)
2. final decision on the ability to set aside ex parte decree. (Para 3 , 18 , 32)
3. jurisdiction of the tribunal under rddbi act. (Para 6 , 11 , 12)
4. interpretation of 'proceeding' under the act. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)

1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 17 May, 2005 in U.R.A.No.7 of 2005 on the file of Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai setting aside the ex parte decree dated 5 January, 2000 in T.A.No.918 of 1997 and directing the Debts Recovery Tribunal to dispose of the Original Application afresh on merits.
The facts:

2. M/s. Indian Bank, Pollachi Branch - the revision petitioner herein sanctioned financial assistance to respondents 1 and 2 under term loan scheme for raising coffee crops and other plantation crops in their estate at Pollachi. The Bank disbursed a sum of Rs.3,08,000/- on 3 November 1980 after securing equitable mortgage of the property, which is the subject matter of the revision petition.

3. The respondents 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as "borrowers") failed to honour their commitments. This made the Bank to file a suit before the learned Subordinate Ju








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top