MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. Manikumar, J.
Suseelamma M. and Others v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Chennai and Another
1. Being aggrieved by the order made by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Chennai, 1st respondent herein, in the appeal petition in Pa. Ma. No. 2150 / P1/2004, dated 26-12-2006, and the subsequent demand by the Sub-Registrar (District Registrar Cadre), Chennai, 2nd respondent herein, made in I. No. 8 of 2003, D/- 7-9-2007, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed.
2. Wife, sons and daughters of Late Krishnaiah Chetty, have filed this appeal. A Deed, dated 9-10-2003, has been executed by the 1st respondent along her sons and daughters, respondents 2 to 6, in favour of the 7th respondent and his three minor sons, and the said document has been presented in the Office of the Sub-Registrar, District Registrar Cadre, Sowcarpet, Chennai. The document has been kept pending under S.33 of the Indian Stamp Act , 1899, as it was not duly stamped. The Sub-Registrar, (District Registrar Cadre), Chennai, 2nd respondent herein, after giving notice to the appellants, treated the document in question, as "conveyance", chargeable under Art. 23 of Schedule 1 of the Indian Stamp Act , 1899, on the ground that the releasees 2 to 4 do not have any pre - existing right over the prope
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.