Suseelamma M. and Others v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Chennai and Another

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2014 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 78

MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. Manikumar, J.
Suseelamma M. and Others v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Chennai and Another

Advocates:
For the Appellants: Mr. R. Thiagarajan
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Venugopal

Table of Content
1. aggrieved parties appeal against the classification of a deed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding rights following inheritance and deed classifications. (Para 3 , 4)
3. government rationale on classifications and property rights. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. discussion on prevailing legal standards for releases. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. clarification on co-ownership and its implications under law. (Para 11 , 12)
6. final legal interpretation on document classification and inheritance. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
7. dismissal of appeal with final orders. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)

1. Being aggrieved by the order made by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Chennai, 1st respondent herein, in the appeal petition in Pa. Ma. No. 2150 / P1/2004, dated 26-12-2006, and the subsequent demand by the Sub-Registrar (District Registrar Cadre), Chennai, 2nd respondent herein, made in I. No. 8 of 2003, D/- 7-9-2007, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed.

2. Wife, sons and daughters of Late Krishnaiah Chetty, have filed this appeal. A Deed, dated 9-10-2003, has been executed by the 1st respondent along her sons and daughters, respondents 2 to 6, in favour of the 7th respondent and his three mi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2014 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 78

MADRAS HIGH COURTS. Manikumar, J.Suseelamma M. and Others v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Chennai and Another

Cases Referred (3)

MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. Manikumar, J.
Suseelamma M. and Others v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Chennai and Another