Back
MADRAS HIGH COURT
[Name], J
Murugan B. and Others v. Secretary Bar Council of India and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners request to advance in their legal studies. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. university regulations on attendance are enforced. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments for and against attendance mandates presented. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. legal standards for attendance must comply with bar council rules. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 17) |
| 5. court's decision to allow petitioners to continue their studies. (Para 22 , 23) |
1. The prayer in all these Writ Petitions is for a mandamus, directing the respondents to allow the petitioners to continue their 3rd year B.A.,B.L.(Hons.) course in the third respondent college.
2. According to the petitioners, they got admissions in the third respondent college in the year 2011 for the Law Course B.A., B.L.(Hons.) and now they are to join 3rd year course; their college informed them that they are short of attendance in two subjects and hence they have not been allowed to do their 3rd year course; they got above 80% attendance in all the subject classes except one or two subjects, but the college authorities have on their own fixed the minimum attendance in each subject at 80% and they were not allowed to write the examination in the subjects, which lack the required percentag
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
