SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49

MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. Manikumar, J
Mr. A. Irudayam – Appellant
Versus
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner alleges arbitrary fee collection. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. respondent defends authority and activities. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court questions public interest validity of petitions. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. court dismisses petitions as lacking merit. (Para 11)
5. final ruling on dismissal of petitions. (Para 12)

1. These Writ Petitions designed as Public Interest Litigations have been filed Mr. A. Irudayam, a practising Advocate with varied prayer. The petitioner would state that he served as a Teacher in a Higher Secondary School at Madurai for about 7 = years, thereafter, joined the services of the E.S.I., Corporation where he worked for about 10 years and then joined the second respondent organisation namely The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India as an Assistant Secretary in the Head Office at New Delhi. The petitioner would further state that functioned as the Head of the Southern Region of the second respondent Institute from June 2002 to August 2007 exercising jurisdiction over the Institutes in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Pondicherry. The petitioner would state that he is conscious of the problems faced by the Chartered Account
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top