MADRAS HIGH COURT
*Satish K. Agnihotri, P. Devadass, JJ.
Juvalamukhi V. v. District Magistrate-Cum-District Collector Coimbatore and Others
1. Since both the writ petitions emanate from one and the same order, they are considered and decided by this common order.
2. The facts in a nutshell, leading to the filing of the instant writ petitions are that the petitioners entered into lease agreements dated 26 July 2010 and 07 June 2010 respectively, with the respondents 3 and 4 in respect of a portion situated in the ground floor of the building bearing Door No. 147, Thiruvenkatasamy Road (West), R. S. Puram, Coimbatore 641 002, for a period of eleven months on a monthly rent of Rs.30,000/- per month. The respondents 3 and 4 stood guarantee for the loan availed by one Vignesh Alloys Private Ltd. from the second respondent - Canara Bank on mortgage of the properties in question belonging to the fourth respondent. Upon the secured asset having been classified as NPA, a demand notice under S.13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short "the SARFAESI Act) was issued to the borrower, viz., Vignesh Alloys Private Ltd., on 08 October 2012, calling upon the said company to pay a sum of Rs.26,20,84,716.87. Notices were issued to all the guarantors, incl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.