SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39

MADRAS HIGH COURT
string, string
Babu M. v. State


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [List of names]
For the Respondents: [List of names]

Table of Content
1. context of the accusation and background details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. investigation findings and witness testimonies. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court reflections on credibility of evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. assessing culpability and the impact of provocation. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. final ruling and sentencing considerations. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)

1. The appellant is the sole accused in SC No. 47 of 2012 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Namakkal. He stood charged for offences under S.302 and S.506(ii) IPC. By judgment dated 19.12.2012, the trial Court convicted him under both charges and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six years for the offence under S.302 IPC and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence under S.506(ii) IPC. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the accused / appellant is before this Court with this appeal.

2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:
[a] The deceased in this case was one Kavitha. The accused and the deceased had fallen in love and married 11 years before the occurrence.




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top