Back
MADRAS HIGH COURT
, J
Natarajan K. and Others v. Thiru v. Venkataraman and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of contempt proceedings regarding interim orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal principles related to the limitation period for contempt applications. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 3. harmonization of statutory limitations with judicial authority in contempt matters. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 4. final ruling dismissing the contempt petition due to limitation breach. (Para 32) |
1. The contempt petition is preferred against an interim order passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.32764 of 2003 and W.V.M.P.No.1084 of 2004 in W.P.No.26829 of 2003 dated 28.02.2006, this Court passed an interim order as under:
"ORDER: - These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions and the respective affidavits filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. V. Radha - krishnan Advocate for the petitioner in WPMP. No. 32764/03 and 1st respondent in WVMP. No.1084/04 and of Mr. S. Jagadeeswaran, Advocate for the 4th respondent in WPMP. No. 32764/03 and for the petitioner in WVMP. No. 1084/04, the court made the following order: -
Following the order passed by the Hon'ble First Bench in WAMP. No. 1659 of 2005 in W.A.No.887 of 2005, there will be an order of interim stay of the operation of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
