SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 79812

MADRAS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
*K. Baskaran (Presiding Judicial Member), S. M. Murugesshan (Member)
Stella T. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation


1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant / complainant under S.15 read with S.17(1)(a)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order of the learned District Consumer Disputes Redresssal Forum Chennai (North) passed in C.C. No. 30/2008 dated 8.4.2011 seeking enhancement of relief.
For the sake of convenience and brevity the parties are referred to here as they stood arrayed in the District Forum.
The factual background culminating in this appeal is as follows:
1. That the appellant / complainant had filed a complainant against the three respondents / opposite parties claiming Rs.15,00,000 as compensation on the ground of alleged deficiency in service and for a sum of Rs. 10,000 towards costs alleging inter alia that the complainant was covered under the Employees State Insurance Scheme and on 2.6.2006 she was admitted to the 2nd opposite party hospital for incisional hernia and the 3rd opposite party Doctor Kannapiran performed surgery for the same on 8.6.2006 and after surgery the complainant developed nauseating feeling but nobody in the said hospital attended her and hence the complainant started vomiting and suffered severe headache and she could not pass urine












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top