Back
MADRAS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
*K. Baskaran (Presiding Judicial Member), S. M. Murugesshan (Member)
Stella T. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of negligence claim and treatment history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on the appeal and reasoning for relief. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding adequacy of compensation. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court’s findings on evidence and compensation. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling dismissing the appeal. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant / complainant under S.15 read with S.17(1)(a)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order of the learned District Consumer Disputes Redresssal Forum Chennai (North) passed in C.C. No. 30/2008 dated 8.4.2011 seeking enhancement of relief.
For the sake of convenience and brevity the parties are referred to here as they stood arrayed in the District Forum.
The factual background culminating in this appeal is as follows:
1. That the appellant / complainant had filed a complainant against the three respondents / opposite parties claiming Rs.15,00,000 as compensation on the ground of alleged deficiency in service and for a sum of Rs. 10,000 towards costs alleging inter alia that the complainant was covered under the Employees State Insurance Scheme and on 2.6.2006 she was admitted to the 2nd opposite pa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
