IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A,, J
Union Territory of Puducherry – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. commercial agreements necessitate strict adherence to defined consumer classifications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. determining tariff classification impacts financial responsibilities. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. regulatory oversight requires clear demarcations of jurisdiction in inter-state energy sales. (Para 25 , 29 , 34) |
| 4. judicial intervention is necessary to rectify regulatory misinterpretations of consumer classifications. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
The Government of India issued directives to the Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as " NLC") to divert energy to the Union Territory of Puducherry to the extent indicated in the Government Order. The agreement executed between the NLC and Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as "TNEB") on 9 March 2001 contained a mandatory provision that supply should be made to the Union Territory of Puducherry treating the transaction as an inter - state sale. The TNEB initially supplied electricity to Puducherry treating it as an industrial consumer and collected only the cost payable to NLC together with wheeling charges at 10 paise per KWH. However, in the subsequent Order issued by the Government of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.