Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.K. Tahilramani, CJ, M. Duraiswamy, J
Vasantha Kumar @ Veer Vasanthakumar v. Director Town and Country Planning Chennai and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed a writ petition claiming illegal approval of layout. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. ongoing civil suit overlaps with writ petition claims. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. defense argues that the land is private, undermining petitioner's claims. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal principle emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court cites precedent to affirm the obligation of honest representation. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. failure to come with clean hands results in dismissal of petition. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. writ petition dismissed with costs due to suppression of facts. (Para 20) |
1. The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition as a Public Interest Litigation to issue a Writ of declaration to declare the approval of the layout bearing DTCP No.351/73 granted by the 2nd respondent in favour of 10th respondent and declaring the DTCP No.351/73 layout as null and void and direct the respondents 1 to 8 to demolish the existing structure raised by the respondents 10 to 13 illegally based upon the above said unlawful approval granted to him, which construction situated in Survey No.392/12 measuring and extent of Ac 0.20 cents and another property measuri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
