SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 60667

MADRAS HIGH COURT
,
Nazar Akthar v. Marimuthu and Another


Table of Content
1. appellant's appeal challenges the commissioner’s compensation award. (Para 1 , 2)
2. deposit conditions precede appeal considerations. (Para 3 , 4)
3. regulatory directives on appeal processing without deposit. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

1. The appellant has come forward with the present appeal challenging the order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation - I (Deputy Commissioner of Labour - I), Chennai - 6 dated 26.8.2016 made in WC No. 178 of 2014.

2. It is not in dispute that a 22 - year - old young boy met with an accident on 26.5.2007 in the course of and out of employment and a case has been registered. As the legal representatives of the deceased have not produced any document with regard to wages drawn by the employee, the minimum wage applicable on the date of accident has been taken into account and compensation of Rs. 2,93,502 has been awarded.

3. Though several facts can be narrated, this court is not inclined to go into the same, as in the light of S.30 and S.30 - A of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, which were prevalent on the date of accident, the amount has got to be deposited, without which appeal cannot be entertained.

4. In this case, no amount ha





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top