MADRAS HIGH COURT
,
Nazar Akthar v. Marimuthu and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's appeal challenges the commissioner’s compensation award. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. deposit conditions precede appeal considerations. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. regulatory directives on appeal processing without deposit. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
1. The appellant has come forward with the present appeal challenging the order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation - I (Deputy Commissioner of Labour - I), Chennai - 6 dated 26.8.2016 made in WC No. 178 of 2014.
2. It is not in dispute that a 22 - year - old young boy met with an accident on 26.5.2007 in the course of and out of employment and a case has been registered. As the legal representatives of the deceased have not produced any document with regard to wages drawn by the employee, the minimum wage applicable on the date of accident has been taken into account and compensation of Rs. 2,93,502 has been awarded.
3. Though several facts can be narrated, this court is not inclined to go into the same, as in the light of S.30 and S.30 - A of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, which were prevalent on the date of accident, the amount has got to be deposited, without which appeal cannot be entertained.
4. In this case, no amount ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.