Back
MADRAS HIGH COURT
V. Bhavani Subbaroyan, J
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board – Appellant
Versus
S.S. Minerals Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial details of the appellant and respondent. (Para 1) |
| 2. application and conditions of tariff concession for s.s. minerals. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments from both sides regarding the applicability of g.o. ms.no.29. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's interpretation of eligibility and the relevance of investments over leased machinery. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. final decision regarding appeal outcomes and subsequent applications. (Para 20 , 21) |
1. The Appellant in W.A. No.934 of 2016 is the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (the TNEB). By order dated 07.06.2013 in W.P. No.34001 of 2002, the writ petition filed by the Respondent, S.S. Minerals Ltd. (S.S. Minerals) was allowed and the order dated 27.07.2002 of the TNEB was quashed. The said order is impugned in W.A. No.934 of 2016. W.P. No. 2624 of 2020 is filed by Larsen and Toubro Limited (L and T) for a mandamus to direct the TNEB to consider its application for a high tension power connection without insisting on the payment of the amounts claimed from the previous owner of the premises, S.S. Minerals, as a condition. L and T is stated to have acquired about 2.41 acres of land from S.S. Minerals by S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
