Back
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Thiruvasagam v. State by Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Jayankondam Ariyalur
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment of conviction and appeal context. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution’s evidence and victim's narrative. (Para 3 , 4 , 10) |
| 3. arguments from both sides regarding consent. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. critical examination of consent's validity. (Para 21 , 24) |
| 5. final verdict and implications of consent. (Para 27 , 28) |
1. The present Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 25.10.2013 passed in S.C. No. 2 of 2013 by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur.
2. The Appellant is the sole accused. He stood charged for the offence under S.376 and S.506(i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. By judgment dated 25.10.2013, the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur convicted the Accused under S.376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment. He is acquitted for the charge under S.506(i) of the Indian Penal Code. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the Accused is before this Court by filing the present Criminal Appeal.
3. The case of the prosecution in br
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
