MADRAS HIGH COURT
, J
Thiagarajan S. and Others v. V. S. Suresh Managing Director M/s. Real Value Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Chennai
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contempt petition initiation and underlying events. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claims of property alienation and respondent's defense. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 14) |
| 3. arguments regarding property and limitations on contempt actions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. distinction between alienation and mortgage in legal terms. (Para 19 , 21 , 24) |
1. This Contempt petition has been filed by the applicants contending that the respondent has committed an act of contempt by disobeying the orders of this Court dated 17.05.2012 in O.A.No.428 of 2012. Considering the fact that the application is one for contempt, I do not wish to delve too much into the facts set out in the S.9 application and shall narrate the facts relevant for disposing the contempt petition.
2. The petitioners and the respondent had entered into an agreement for developing the property. The agreement had contained an arbitration clause in and by which parties had resolved to settle their disputes through arbitration. Since disputes arose between the parties the petitioners had filed O.A.No.428 of 2012 seeking an order of an interim injunction restraining the respondent, their men or agents, servants, representatives or any person
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.