Back
MADRAS HIGH COURT
T. V. N. S. Raghunathan, J
Thirupathi K. v. State rep. by The Inspector of Police Erode North Police Station Erode
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against conviction time constraints and charges. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments challenging the validity of the dying declaration. (Para 5 , 7 , 17) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the sufficiency of evidence. (Para 10 , 19) |
| 4. court observations on the admissibility of dying declarations. (Para 12 , 13 , 18) |
| 5. final judgment emphasizes the conviction upholding. (Para 15 , 20) |
1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction made by the learned Mahalir Fast Track / 2nd Additional Sessions Judge of Erode in S.C.No. 46 of 2017 dated 15.05.2018.
2. The respondent police registered the case against the appellant in Crime No.66 of 2015 for offence under S.174 Cr.P.C. After completing the investigation, laid charge sheet before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode. He has taken the charge sheet on file in P.R.C.No.8 of 2017. After completing the formalities u/s.207 Cr.P.C., committed the case to the Principal Sessions Judge, Erode, to proceed with the case u/s.209 Cr.P.C. Since the offence is exclusively triable by the court of Session, the learned Principal Sessions Judge, taken the case on file in S.C.No.46 of 2017 and made over the case to the Mahila Court
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
