SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 60701

MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. Vaidyanathan, J
Kumar alias Kumaresan v. State


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. P. K. Ganesh
For the Respondent: Mr. M. Babu Muthu Meeran

Table of Content
1. abduction and repeated sexual assault on a minor. (Para 1 , 2)
2. victim's clear account of the events. (Para 3)
3. importance of victim testimony in conviction. (Para 4 , 6)
4. legal standards for evidence in child sexual assault cases. (Para 7 , 8 , 15)
5. compensation warranted under the pocso act. (Para 19 , 22)

1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21.08.2017 passed in Special Case No.14 of 2017 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimanram (Fast Track Mahila Court) Erode.

2. The facts of the case in brief is as under:
The victim boy is the son the de facto complainant. On 17.11.2016, the victim boy went to his grandmother' s house and stayed there. Next day morning at about 9.00 a.m., he went to school by a mini bus. After the school was over, he did not reach back to his parents' house. On the way to his home he got down at Erode bus stand and was urinating behind the bus. The accused who came there in a motorcycle took the victim boy by telling that he would drop him at his house. As the accused took a different road, the victim boy questioned him. The accused threatened the victim boy a

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top