MADRAS HIGH COURT
string, string
Iyyappan alias Balaji v. State
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction under s.394 ipc for robbery upheld. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. defense argued witness intoxication affected credibility. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court affirmed lower court findings, dismissing appeal. (Para 7 , 10) |
1. The petitioner / A1 was convicted by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge - cum - Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vellore / trial Court in S.C.No.16 of 2011, dated 17.02.2012, for offence under S.394 IPC and sentenced to undergo seven years Rigorous Imprisonment. Similarly, A2 and A3 were convicted for offence under S.394 r/w 34 IPC and sentenced to undergo seven years Rigorous Imprisonment. As against the judgment of conviction and sentence, the petitioner / A1 and A3 preferred an appeal before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vellore / lower appellate Court. The learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, by judgment, dated 18.07.2013 in C.A.No.45 of 2012 confirmed the judgment of the trial Court in S.C.No.16 of 2011, dated 17.02.2012, against which the petitioner / A1 is before this Court, by way of this Criminal Revision Case.
2. Since there was no representation for the petitioner, this Court appointed Ms. D. Chandralekha as Legal Aid Coun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.