Back
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
A. D. Ranjan, J
Nilgiris Dairy Farm Private Limited VVV Enterprises v. Veeramani
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of complaint and original order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the complainant's claims and responses from the ops. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. district forum's findings on evidence. (Para 7) |
| 4. arguments and counterarguments presented by counsel. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's observations and decision. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
1. The appellants herein / Opposite Parties before the District Forum challenge the Order, dated 16.11.2016, passed by the DCDRF, Chennai - North, in C.C. No.124 of 2013, whereby, the District Forum partly allowed the complaint filed by the complainant / 1st respondent herein against the appellant in F.A. No. 97 of 2017/2nd OP as well as the appellant in FA. No. 235 of 2017/1st OP, by directing them to jointly pay Rs. 50,000 as compensation to the complainant for mental agony and another sum of Rs. 5,000 towards litigation expenses.
2. Inasmuch as, in both these appeals, challenge is made to the same impugned order and the issues involved therein being one and the same, they are disposed of by this common order. 4
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to in this order as per their respective rankings before the District Forum.
4. In
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
