Back
MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. Nagamuthu, J
Muthuraj alias Pavadai P. v. State
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused charged and prosecuted under pocso for sexual assault. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 2. appeal grounds discussed, focusing on evidence inconsistencies. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 3. victim's testimony deemed credible and sufficient for conviction. (Para 15 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34) |
| 4. judgment confirming conviction and appeal dismissal. (Para 36 , 37) |
1. The accused in Special S.C.No.7 of 2015 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri District, is the appellant in the criminal appeal.
2. The Appellant / Accused has been prosecuted by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Pennagaram, Dharmapuri District for having caused aggravated penetrative sexual assault on the victim girl on 23.10.2014 and 17.01.2015 punishable offence under S.5 (1) r/w 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and S.506 (i) of IPC.
3. In the trial Court the prosecution examined 16 witnesses (P.W.1 to P.W.16) and filed 18 documents (Ex.P.1 to Ex.P18) and two material objects (M.O.1 and M.O.2). On the side of the appellant / accused neither the evidence nor the document was marked.
4. The trial Court on considering the prosecution evidence found t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
