SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 70909

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
THE UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
M.K. KHADER ALI – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.12.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Rev.A.(W).Nos.64 to 68 of 2006 in W.P.Nos.1342, 1343, 1344, 2077 & 2087 of 2001 and M.P.Nos.1,1,1 & 1 of 2006 Rev.A.No.64 of 2006 The Union of India, represented by Chief General Manager, Telecom, Chennai – 600 002. ... Petitioner Vs.

1. M.K.Khader Ali.

2. K.L.Suresh

3. G.Krishnamurthy

4. K.Suryanarayanan

5. K.Sekar

6. R.Chinnathambi

7. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India to review the order dated

24.07.2006 in W.P.No.1342 of 2001 For Petitioner : Mr.Vijayakrishnan.R.P.

for Mr.R.Priyakumar For Respondents : No appearance for R1 to R6 R7-Tribunal – CAT Rev.A.No.65 of 2006 1. The Union of India, represented by Chief General Manager, Telecommunications, Tamilnadu Circle, Chennai – 600 002.

2. Senior Superintendent, Telegraphic Traffic (Admn)

CTO, madras

3. Sub Divisional Engineer, Central Telegraphic Office, Tiruchirappalli.

4. Sub Divisional Engineer, Telegraphy, Telegraph Office, Tuticorin. ... Petitioners Vs.

1. P.Asha

2. P.Gurusamy Pandi

3. M.Murugesan

4. V.Mathiazhagan

5. G.Ilangovan 6. K.Natarajan

7. P.Kadarkaraiyandi

8. T.Anthonimuthu

9. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India to review the order dated

24.07.2006 in W.P.No.1343 of 2001 For Petitioners : Mr.Vijayakrishnan.R.P.

for Mr.R.Priyakumar For Respondents : No appearance for R1 to R8 R9-Tribunal – CAT Rev.A.No.66 of 2006 The Union of India, represented by Chief General Manager, Telecom,Chennai – 600 002. ... Petitioner Vs.

1. M.Muthukumar

2. M.Radhakrishnan

3. P.Veerasamy 4. K.Samayavel 5. S.Sivakumar 6. Manivannan

7. K.Chellakannu

8. K.Umamaheswari

9. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India to review the order dated

24.07.2006 in W.P.No.1344 of 2001 For Petitioner : Mr.Vijayakrishnan.R.P.

for Mr.R.Priyakumar For Respondents : No appearance for R1 to R8 R7-Tribunal – CAT Rev.A.No.67 of 2006 1. The Union of India, represented by Chief General Manager, Telecommunications, Tamilnadu Circle, Chennai – 600 002.

2. Chief Superintendent, Telegraphic Traffic (Admn)

CTO, madras

3. The General Manager, Telecommunications, Tanjore – 613 001 ... Petitioners Vs.

1. E.S.Seshadri

2. s.Anantaraman 3. I.Krishnakumar

4. P.Boopal

5. V.Srinivasan

6. G.Kannan 7. S.Krishnan

8. S.Sivasankaran

9. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India to review the order dated

24.07.2006 in W.P.No.2077 of 2001 For Petitioners : Mr.Vijayakrishnan.R.P.

for Mr.R.Priyakumar For Respondents : No appearance for R1 to R8 R9-Tribunal – CAT Rev.A.No.68 of 2006 The Union of India, represented by Chief General Manager, Telecommunications, Tamilnadu Circle, Chennai – 600 002. ... Petitioner Vs.

1. C.K.Govindarajan 2. A.Basheer Ahmed

3. Muruganandam

4. R.Ravimarimuthu

5. M.Chelladurai 6. K.Palanisamy

7. T.Natarajan

8. M.Paul

9. J.Ramachandran

10. R.Shanmugam

11. B.Thangavelu

12. C.N.Tamaraiselvi

13. M.S.Veeraraghavan

14. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India to review the order dated

24.07.2006 in W.P.No.2087 of 2001 For Petitioner : Mr.Vijayakrishnan.R.P.

for Mr.R.Priyakumar For Respondents : No appearance for R1 to R13 R14-Tribunal – CAT COMMON ORDER S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

The Review Petitions have been instituted to review the common order dated 24.07.2006 passed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top