Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Senthilkumar, J
Marico Limited – Appellant
Versus
Prahalad Rai Kedia – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. alleged oversight of judicial precedents in copyright dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding failure to consider key prior judgments. (Para 4 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. court's exploration of review limitations and scope. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. discussion on review jurisdiction and procedural correctness. (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. final order of dismissal in review petition. (Para 12) |
ORDER
This Review Petition has been filed to review the order dated 11.11.2025 made in (T)OP(CR)No.1 of 2024.
2.The learned senior counsel for the Petitioner submitted that while deciding the impugned order, this Court omitted to consider the Judgment of the Division Bench of Delhi High Court in C.S.(Comm).No.1569 of 2016 dated 27.08.2018 and F.A.O.(O.S.)(COMM).No.310 of 2018 dated 21.12.2018. These cases involve the same parties and the same issue. In those cases, the 1st Respondent was restrained and the Suit was decided in favour of the Petitioner regarding the very same issue involved in the present proceedings. Apart from that, the Delhi High Court directed the 1st Respondent to withdraw its copyright registration No.A-85790/2009.
3.The learned senior counsel for the Petitioner further submitted that
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
