IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P.DHANABAL
S.Milton Babu and 6 others – Appellant
Versus
G.David Ajay Kumar and 41 others – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.12.2025 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL A.Nos.5765 and 5766 of 2025 in C.S.No.109 of 2025
1. Milton Babu 2. Benedict I.R
3. S.Manimaran
4. D.Sureshkumar 5. J.Gunasekaran
6. D.Christopher
7.G.Manuvel ... Applicants in A.No.5765 of 2025
1. Gummadi Prabhu Kiran Kumar
2. K.Dayanand
3. Reverend Mekala Jayanand
4. T.Ravikumar
5. Ravula Samson Jayker 6. Manthri Solomon Raju
7. Wilson Mettu
8. G.Eber Jaya Paul
9. V.S.Naveen Shailender
10. Kurukuntala James Cecil Victor
11. P.Isiah Pradeep 12. J.Rahul Edward
13. D.Mani Charles ... Applicants in A.No.5766 of 2025 vs
1. G.David Ajay Kumar 2. P.David Christopher
3. T.Samuel
4. A.Anandapaul
5. A.Lincoln
6. Ayyala Danam
7. The Church of South India rep. By its Officer Bearers, CSI Synod Secretariat, CSI Centre, No.5, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014
8. Church of South India Trust Association, A registered Company rep. By its Directors, CSI Synod Secretariat, No.5, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014 9. K.Reuben Mark
10. C.Fernandaz Rathina Raja
11. Vimal Sukumar
12. Rev.Dr.R.Rajastalin
13. Rev.J.Stalin Prabakar 14. Rev.J.C.Ravichandran 15. D.Damodharan Ganiah
16. N.Sam Jeyapaul
17. Rev.C.Jacob Wincilin
18. Nelson Chelladurai
19. Arul Jeevaraj Desing
20. Rev.A.Devendra Kumar
21. Rev.J.Kuttimani
22. Edward Johnson
23. Charles Sundar Singh 24. D.Joshua Devapriyan
25. E.Prabakar Sathya Singh
26. A.Sugirthajaj
27. P.Ebenezer
28. A.Rathinaswamy
29. Devapriyan
30. D.Wesley Daniel
31. C.Samuel Jebakumar (Defendandants 16-25 impleaded as per the order dated 30.10.2025 in A.No.3851 of 2025 and time extended as per the order dated 04.11.2025 in C.S.No.109 of 2025)
32. S.Kumar Alias Sivakumar
33. J.Roshan 34. A.Joshua 35. S.R.Esha
36. B.Bhaskara
37. Denil Thomas
38. Stanly John
39. P.Kunjumon
40. Rev.Sanilraj Simon
41. Rev. Albin Rose M.Wilson
42. S.Shajimon (Defendands 31 to 36 impleaded as per order dated 30.10.2025 in A.No.5335 of 2025 and time extended as per order dated
04.11.2025 in C.S.No.109 of 2025) ..Respondents in A.No.5765 of
2025 Prayer in A.No.5765 of 2025: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules r/w Order 1 Rule 10(2) & Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code to implead the applicants herein as defendants in C.S.No.109 of 2025.
Prayer in A.No.5766 of 2025: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules r/w Order 1 Rule 10(2) & Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code to implead the applicants herein as defendants in C.S.No.109 of 2025.
A.No.5765 of 2025 For Applicants : Mr.A.L.Franc Paul Asirvadam A.No.5766 of 2025 For Applicants : Ms.Ramapriya Gopalakrishnan
C O M M O N O R D E R
These applications have been filed by the applicants to implead them as defendants in the suit.
2. According to the applicants in A.No.5766 of 2025, the applicants are members of the Medak Diocese and have been active and communicant members of the Church of South India and their membership continues to be recognised by the ecclesiastical authorities of the Church. The applicants were informed about the notice published in the Chennai Edition of ‘The Hindu’ Newspaper, regarding the above suit, which was filed under Order 1 Rule VIII of Civil Procedure Code. Further, the applicants were also aware that litigation concerning the very same subject matter have been previously instituted and was adjudicated upon before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in S.L.P. (C) Nos.9079-9081 of 2024 and the Hon’ble Supreme Court had set aside the order passed by this Court in O.S.A.No.198 of 2023, 31-32 of 2024 and O.S.A.Nos.69 of 2022, 189, 191, 204 and 205 of 2023, which had invalidated the election of the office bearers, i.e., Deputy Moderator, the General Secretary and the Treasurer of the Church of South India for the Triennial (2023-2026). Now the issues sought to be raised in the present suit were not agitated in the earlier proceedings, having failed to do so at the appropriate time, the plaintiffs cannot seek to re- open the matter under a fresh cause
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.