SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 70982

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Dr.Justice A.D.MARIA CLETE
CHITRA – Appellant
Versus
SAROJA – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.12.2025 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and C.M.P.No.19577 of 2024 Chitra ... Petitioner Vs.

1. Saroja

2. Tamilselvan

3. Elangovan

4. Latha

5. Kunjithapadham

6. Jayakumar ... Respondents PRAYER in Tr.C.M.P.No.893 of 2024 : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw the final decree petition I.A.No.100 of 2019 in O.S.No.25 of 2014 and Limitation Act of Section 5 Petition I.A.No.543 of 2022 in O.S.No.25 of 2014 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Neyveli and transfer to Additional District and Sessions Court, Vridhachalam.

PRAYER in C.M.P.No.19577 of 2024: To stay all the further proceedings connected with the Final Decree in I.A.No.100 of 2019 in O.S.No.25 of 2014 and I.A.543 of 2022 in O.S.No.25 of 2014 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Neyveli.

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Durai For Respondents : Mr.P.Mani for R1 to R4 R5 refused R6 Served no appearance

ORDER

Heard.

2. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking withdrawal of I.A. No.100 of 2019 (Final Decree Petition) and I.A. No.543 of 2022 (Sec.5 Petition) in O.S. No.25 of 2014 from the file of the Subordinate Court, Neyveli, and for transfer of the same to the Additional District and Sessions Court, Vriddhachalam.

3. The petitioner is the plaintiff/decree-holder in O.S. No.25 of 2014, wherein a preliminary decree was passed on 05.06.2015. Subsequent proceedings, including the Final Decree Application and delay-condonation petitions filed by the respondents, are pending before the Subordinate Court, Neyveli. The petitioner seeks transfer alleging delay, inconvenience, and apprehension of prejudice.

4. The respondents oppose the petition contending that no valid grounds for transfer are made out.

5. This Court has carefully considered the pleadings, the affidavit of the petitioner, and the submissions on either side.

6. Both the courts between which transfer is sought are within the same District Judiciary, and under Section 24(1)(a) CPC, the Principal District Judge is the competent authority to consider transfers between courts subordinate to that District Court. The earlier attempt of the petitioner before the Principal District Judge in Tr.O.P. No.101 of 2024 has already failed, which reinforces that no transferable ground exists. In these circumstances, this Court finds no justification to withdraw the pending interlocutory applications from the Subordinate Court, Neyveli.

7. Tr.C.M.P. No. 893 of 2024 is dismissed. Interim stay granted by this Court on 04.09.2024 shall stand vacated and C.M.P. No. 19577 of 2024 is dismissed. No order as to costs.

09.12.2025 mfa/dpq Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order To

1.The Subordinate Court, Neyveli.

2.The Additional District and Session Court, Vridhachalam.

DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J mfa/ dpq and C.M.P.No.19577 of 2024 Dated: 09.12.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top