US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE
UNITED LABOUR FEDERATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.12.2025 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.47257 of 2025 &
W.M.P.No.52794 of 2025 United Labour Federation Represented by its Secretary D.Ramesh Regn. No. 2657/CNI
4th floor, C.J. Complex No. 149, Thambu Chetty Street Chennai - 600 001. .. Petitioner Vs.
1. Union of India Represented by its Secretary Ministry of Labour and Employment Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rah Marg New Delhi -110 001.
2. Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary Department of Labour and Skill Development Fort St. George Chennai - 600 009. .. Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Declaration declaring the Impugned Notification bearing Reference No. S.O. 5320(E), issued by the Ministry of Labour and Employment, dated 21.11.2025 ULTRA VIRES the provisions of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 as well as being violativ
The jurisdictional issue can be raised at any stage of the proceeding and must be considered based on the date of cause of action. The court's jurisdiction is to be determined by the statutory mandat....
Only scope for interference under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, is in case there is a flagrant disregard of Rules of procedure or in case there is violation of principles of natural ....
The court established that disputes under the Industrial Disputes Act must be resolved within its framework, and writ jurisdiction is not appropriate when an alternative remedy exists.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to decide all issues together in labour matters to prevent undue delay in the adjudication of the real dispute.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article