Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Sathish Kumar, J
S.Fahath – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership history of the disputed properties. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. legal status of the properties as enemy property. (Para 7) |
| 3. petitioner’s argument for rightful ownership and procedural compliance. (Para 9) |
| 4. court's observation regarding the necessity of personal hearing. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. emphasis on maintaining natural justice in decisions impacting civil rights. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. court order to remand for reconsideration with proper process. (Para 21) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order dated 20.03.2023 passed by the first respondent, the present writ petition has been filed.
2.It is the case of the writ petitioner that one Dr.Azizuddin Ahamed was the absolute owner of the lands measuring 31.33 acres comprised in various survey numbers at Pootai village, Sankarapuram Taluk [previously Chidambaram District], presently Kallakurichi District. The said lands were purchased by Dr.Azizuddin Ahamed vide sale deed in document No.3410 of 1964, dated 16.09.1964 from one Tmt.Fathima Begum. Ever since the date of the purchase, he was in possession and enjoyment of the properties. Said Dr.Azizuddin Ahamed was born in undivided India and was an Indian citizen. During his
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
