SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 71349

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
GOVINDAN – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN H.C.P.No.2563 of 2025 Govindan S/o.Kannusamy ... Petitioner Versus

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Thanipadi Police Station, Thanipadi, Thiruvannamalai District. ... Respondents Prayer:- Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to secure the detenue namely Amutha W/o.Govindan, aged about 35 years and produce her before this Court. For Petitioner : Ms.D.Jeevitha For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Karthikeyan

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN J.)

This Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent-Police to secure the detenue, Amutha W/o.Govindan, aged 35 years, produce her before this Court.

2. According to the petitioner, his wife Amutha, female, aged 35 years, has been missing since 21.10.2025. Despite searching all known places, the family was unable to trace her. Therefore, the petitioner lodged a complaint before the second respondent-Police on 22.10.2025, but no action was taken. Thereafter, he submitted a representation before the first respondent-Police on 30.10.2025, which was also not considered. It is further submitted that the petitioner’s mother-in-law also lodged a complaint before the second respondent-Police on 14.11.2025 seeking to secure the custody of her daughter. Since no effective action has been taken till date, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the present petition.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents-Police, on instructions, submitted that after receipt of the complaint, C.S.R.No.391 of 2025 was assigned. He further submitted that since the mobile phone of the petitioner’s wife has been switched off, the respondents-Police are not in position to trace her whereabouts.

4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

5. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner’s wife Amutha, aged 35 years, has been missing since 21.10.2025, and that the complaint was lodged on 14.11.2025, pursuant to which C.S.R.No.391 of 2025 was assigned, this Court finds that no FIR has been registered till date. The second respondent-Police is directed to secure the petitioner’s wife on or before 12.12.2025 and produce her before this Court.

6. With the above direction, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands disposed of.

7. List the matter “For Reporting Compliance’’ on 15.12.2025.

[P.V.,J.] [M.J.R.,J.]

05.12.2025 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No ms To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Thanipadi Police Station, Thanipadi, Thiruvannamalai District.

3. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

P .VELMURUGAN , J., AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J., ms H.C.P.No.2563 of 2025

05.12.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top