SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 71359

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Nagalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The District Revenue officer – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.12.2025 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Review Appln. (Writ) No.82 of 2022 Nagalakshmi ...Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer, District Collector Office, Salem.

2.The Sub-Collector, Mettur, Salem District.

3.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Mettur, Salem District.

4.V.Balamurugan

5.The Assistant Director of Rural Development, Salem, Salem District. ...Respondents PRAYER : This Review Application has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to review the order passed in W.P.No.8977 of 2020 vide order dated

15.11.2021.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sathish Kumar For Respondents : Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to 3 and 5 *******

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The present Review Application has been instituted to review the order of this Court dated 15.11.2021 in W.P.No.8977 of 2020.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the averments in the status report filed by the 3rd respondent was found to be false.

3. Such vague and bald allegations involving merits cannot be re-

adjudicated in review proceedings. Those grounds may be raised in appeal, but, not in review proceedings. The scope of review cannot be expanded for re-adjudication on merits. The petitioner has not established any error apparent warranting exercise of review jurisdiction by this Court.

4. Consequently, the Review Application stands dismissed. No costs.

(S.M.S., J.) (C.K., J.)

05.12.2025 dsa Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No To:

1.The District Revenue Officer, District Collector Office, Salem.

2.The Sub-Collector, Mettur, Salem District.

3.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Mettur, Salem District.

4.The Assistant Director of Rural Development, Salem, Salem District.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

dsa Review Appln. (Writ) No.82 of 2022

05.12.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top