SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 71424

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
R.UMA MAHESWARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR R.Uma Maheswari D/o.a.P.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department Fort St.George Chennai-600 009.

2. The Director Directorate of Indian Medicine and Homeopathy Arignar Anna Hospital Complex Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 106.

3. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Rep. By its Secretary Government Estate Chennai-600 002.

4. State Commissioner of Handicapped Directorate for Handicapped Rehabilitation Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Building Visalatchi Garden, Mylapore Chennai-600 004. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 3rd respondent in Memorandum No.5945/OTD-A1/1996 dated 19.07.2013 and quash the same and direct the respondents 1 to 3 to appoint the petitioner to the post of Asstant Medical Officer (Siddha) for the year 1999-2000 or subsequent year as per persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities), Protection of Rights and Full Participation, Act, 1995.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.E.Sundaram Government Advocate for R1, R2 and R4 Mr.R.Bharanidharan Standing Counsel, for R3 *****

O R D E R

The recruitment pertains to the year 1999-2000. According to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, the posts have already been filled up and the candidate appointed to the said post had scored higher marks than the petitioner.

2. The order sheet reveals that there was no representation for the petitioner in the previous listing.

3. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the writ petitioner either in physical Court or on videoconferencing platform.

In view of the above, the captioned Writ Petition is dismissed for default / non-prosecution. No costs.

05.12.2025 Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking mk To

1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Director Directorate of Indian Medicine and Homeopathy Arignar Anna Hospital Complex Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 106.

3. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Rep. By its Secretary Government Estate Chennai-600 002.

4. State Commissioner of Handicapped Directorate for Handicapped Rehabilitation Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Building Visalatchi Garden, Mylapore Chennai-600 004.

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk

05.12.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top