Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN, JJ
Eros International Media Limited – Appellant
Versus
14 Reels Entertainment Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of the parties involved in the case. (Para 1) |
| 2. reasons for dismissal of applications under section 9. (Para 2) |
| 3. court decision to primarily focus on maintainability arguments. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. citations of previous case laws supporting arguments about section 9. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 5. conclusions on the maintainability of section 9 petitions. (Para 30 , 34) |
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
Under assail is the judgment delivered on 30.10.2025 by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Original Application Nos.997 and 998 of 2025 and Arbitration Application No.1374 of 2025. Applicant in all the applications is the appellant in the present Original Side Appeals. All the applications have been instituted under Section 9 (1)(d) of “the Arbitration and Conciliation Act , 1996” [hereinafter referred as “Act, 1996”] praying for an interim relief.
2. The learned Single Judge dismissed the applications mainly on the ground that Section 9 application is not maintainable, since the appellant has already moved an Execution Petition before the competent Civil Court under The Code of Civil Procedure . During the penden
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
