SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 72010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
S.Mohan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner – Respondent


BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.Mohan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34.

2.The Joint Commissioner, Office of the Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Thanjavur.

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Office of the Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Pudukkottai District.

4.The Fit Person / Inspector, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District, Office at ;

Arulmighu Muthu Mariamman Temple, Konnaiyur, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

5.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukkottai District.

6.The Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathi Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

7.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the responde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top