SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 72100

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
J.Pauline St. Antonys Government Aided High School Adichapuram Thiruvaruru District 614 717 – Appellant
Versus
The Government Of Tamilnadu Rep. By Its Principal Secretary Department Of School Education, Fort St. George Madras 600 009 – Respondent
W.P.No.966 of 2024 | W.P. No. 971 of 2024 | W.P. No. 973 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Father Xavier Arulraj
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Prabhakaran, Mr.A. Francisca

Judicial scrutiny ensures that teacher appointments in minority institutions cannot be denied without substantiated evidence of surplus staff, upholding equitable rights to employment.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus - Approval of teacher appointments in minority aided schools - Petitioners challenged rejection orders of appointment based on surplus staff claims. Court ruled that respondents must prove surplus teachers and that approvals must align with prior judicial rulings. (Paras 11, 12)

(B) Educational regulations - As per the judgment in Secretary to Government and Others Vs. Iruthaya Amali - Institutions' right to fill sanctioned vacancies upheld when no verified surplus teachers exist. (Para 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners were duly appointed as B.T. Assistants in different schools but faced non-approval due to claims of surplus staff by educational authorities, leading to their petitions.

Findings of Court:
The impugned rejection orders were overturned as unsubstantiated, allowing for resubmission of appointment proposals to the corresponding educational authorities.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was the criteria for approval of teacher appointments amidst claims of surplus staffing.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court highlighted the imperative for educational authorities to substantiate claims of surplus staffing in line with legal precedents regarding approved vacancies in minority institutions.

Result: Writ Petitions allowed; impugned orders set aside.

Table of Content
1. writ petitions filed for teacher appointment approvals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioners assert approved vacancies are mischaracterized. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. legal precedent clarifies approval conditions in minority schools. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court mandates educational authorities comply with legal standards. (Para 10)
5. impugned rejection orders reversed, liberty granted for resubmission. (Para 11 , 12)

COMMON ORDER

W.P.No.966 of 2024 has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 31.03.2022 in Na.Ka.No 709 / A4 / 2021 on the file of the 3rd respondent and the consequential proceedings dated 28.03.2023 in O.Mu.No 2174 AA3 / 2023 on the file of the 4th respondent and quash the same directing the respondents 1 to 4 to accord approval to the appointment of the petitioner J.Pauline, working as B.T Assistant (Science) in the 5th respondent St. Antony’s Government Aided High School Adichapuram Thiruvaruru District 614 717 w.e.f 12.02.2019 with all monetary and service benefits.

2. W.P.No.971 of 2024 has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 24.12.2019 in O.Mu.No 2699 AA3 / 2019 on the file of the 4th respondent and quash the same directing the respondents 1 to 4 to accord approval to the appointment of the petitioner Sr. A. Josephin Priya, Working as B.T. Assist (Science) in the 5th respondent St. Joseph Girls Higher Secondary School, Mannargudi, Thiruvaruru District 614 001, w.e.f 06.06.2018, with all monetary and service benefits.

3. W.P.No.973 of 2024 has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 24.12.2019 in O.Mu.No 2701 AA3 / 2019 on the file of the 4th Respondent and quash the same directing the respondents 1 to 4 to accord approval to the appointment of the petitioner E. Arul Abinesha Working as B.T. Assistant (Maths) in the 5th respondent St. Joseph Girls Higher secondary School, Mannargudi, Thiruvaruru District 614 001 w.e.f 01.06.2018, with all monetary and service benefits.

4. The case of the petitioner in W.P.No.966 of 2024 is that the 5th respondent School is established and administered by the Congregation of the Regular Tertiary Franciscan Sisters of Our Lady of Bon Secours. For the purpose of legal perpetuity, the said Congregation is registered as a society. In the year 2001, a Secondary Grade Assistant Post was upgraded as B.T. Assistant vide proceedings dated 05.02.2019 due to voluntary retirement of one Tamilarasi. In the said upgraded post, the petitioner was appointed as B.T. Assistant (Science), by order dated 11.02.2019 in the 5th respondent School w.e.f.12.02.2019. Immediately thereafter, the proposal of the appointment of the petitioner as B.T. Assistant (Science) w.e.f. 12.02.2019 was submitted by the 5th, to the 4th respondent for approval. However, the 4th respondent vide impugned order dated 06.11.2019, returned the proposal without approval stating that till all the surplus posts are deployed, approval cannot be granted. Thereafter, the 5th respondent Management submitted the details and requested for approval of the appointment of the petitioner. Again, the 4th respondent vide impugned order dated 28.03.2023 rejected the approval referring to the proceedings of the 3rd respondent 31.03.2022 as if the 5th respondent Corporate Management has surplus teacher. Without deployment, appointing the petitioner in the surplus post is not sustainable one. Challenging the same, the Writ Petition in W.P.No.966 of 2024 has been filed.

5. The case of the petitioner in W.P.No.971 of 2024 is that the 5th respondent School is established and administered by the Congregation of the Regular Tertiary Franciscan Sisters of Our Lady of Bon Secours. For the purpose of legal perpetuity, the said Congregation is registered as a society. The petitioner was app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top