Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Murali Shankar, J
Lakshmana Kandhan @ Karuppasamy @ Karuppaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu represented by, The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Palayamkottai Division, Tirunelveli District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court canceled bail due to non-compliance with conditions. (Para 1 , 2 , 18) |
| 2. the appellant's previous criminal record was scrutinized in decisions. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments centered around the necessity of bail conditions compliance. (Para 8 , 9 , 14) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
The Criminal Appeal in CRL.A.(MD)No.1126 of 2025 is directed against the order made in CRL.M.P.No.111 of 2025 in S.C.No.75 of 2024 dated 09.09.2025, on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, (PCR), Tirunelveli, cancelling the bail granted to the appellant / Accused No.14.
2.The Criminal Appeal in CRL.A.(MD)No.1154 of 2025 is directed against the order made in CRL.M.P.No.250 of 2025 in S.C.No.75 of 2024 dated 16.09.2025, on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, (PCR), Tirunelveli, dismissing the petition for discharge filed under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
3.The appellant in both the appeals is the 14th accused in S.C.No.75 of 2024 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, (PCR), Tirunelveli, 4.On the basis of the complaint lodged by the second respondent / defacto complainant in both the appeals, FIR came to be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
