IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN and WMP No.11674 of 2025 R.Ananthi Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Principal Secretary to the Government, School Education Department, Fort St., George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Secretary to Government, Finance (Pension) Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

3.The Accountant General, DMS Campus, Tenynampet, Chennai – 600 018.

4.The Director Central Silk Board, Madiwala, Hosur Road, Bangalore 560 068.

5.The Director of School Education, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006.

6.The Chief Educational Officer Office of Chief Educational Officer, Tirupathur, Tirupathur District.

7.The District Educational Officer, Office of the District Educational Officer, Tirupathur, Tirupathur District.

8.The Head Master IVN, Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Kejalnaickan Patti, Tirupathur, Tirupathur District.

Respondent(s)

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in relates to the impugned rejection order passed by the 1st respondent in letter No. letter No.7507 / pa.ka 3 (2) / 2021-9, dated 08.08.2023 and quash the same, and consequently direct the respondents to transfer the name of the petitioner from contributory pension scheme (CPS) to old pension scheme.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.V. Kasinatha Bharathi For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Prabhakaran Government Advocate for R1, R5, R6 & R7.

Mr.Azizullahkhan Government Advocate for R2 Mr.Su.Srinivasan for R4

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent, dated 08.08.2023, thereby, rejected the request made by the petitioner to consider her earlier service for pensionary benefits.

2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed on

04.01.1991 as Field Assistant in the fourth respondent Silk Board and was working from 04.01.1991 to 19.12.2007. While being so, the petitioner was called for certificate verification for the post of PG Assistant Science, by letter dated 16.06.2007. Therefore, she appeared for the certificate verification on

02.07.2007 and she was selected for the post of PG Assistant (Science). In the meanwhile, the petitioner also duly informed her willingness to the fourth respondent about her selection to the post of PG Assistant. She also sought for permission from the fourth respondent to join in the said post without break in service and continuity of service in the new post in Tamil Nadu Government. Subsequently, she was relieved from the fourth respondent and joined in the post of PG Assistant (Science) on 20.12.2007. Till 19.12.2007, she was in service with the fourth respondent and the fourth respondent issued relieving order on 19.12.2007 along with service certificate cum relieving order to the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a request to count her past service rendered under the fourth respondent for her pensionary benefits. However, it was rejected by the first respondent on the ground that the petitioner resigned her job owing to her personal reasons and as such, her past service cannot be taken into account for pensionary benefits.

3.It is seen from the counter affidavit filed by the sixth respondent and the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate that the petitioner resigned her previous job for personal reasons. Therefore, as per Rule 23 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, her past service cannot be taken into account for pensionary benefits.

4.Rule 23 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, is extracted hereunder:

23.Forfeiture of service on resignation – (1)

Resignation from a service or post entails forfeiture of past service:

Provided that a resignation shall not entail forfeiture of past service if it has been submitted to take up with proper permission, another appointment, whether temporary or permanent, under the Government where service qualifies.

As per the pro