Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhanabal, J
Raja – Appellant
Versus
Indira – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeals arise from reversal of a trial court ruling regarding the transfer of property. (Para 1 , 3 , 5 , 15) |
| 2. background details establish acquisition of property under duress. (Para 6 , 9 , 14) |
| 3. no valid consideration leads to the sale deed's nullification. (Para 28 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. court dismisses appeals confirming judgment of the lower court. (Para 34 , 35) |
COMMON JUDGEMENT These Second Appeals have been preferred against the common Judgement and Decree dated 25.09.2013 passed by the learned the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, in A.S.No.22 of 2011 and A.S.No.23 of 2011.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking in the Trial Court and in appropriate places, their rank in the First Appellate Court and the present second appeals would also be indicated.
3. Before the Trial Court, the first respondent in S.A.No.272 of 2015, (hereinafter the term “respondent in S.A.No.271 of 2015” shall also refer to “the first respondent” in S.A.Nos.271 & 272 of 2015 collectively) has filed a suit in O.S.No.49 of 2005 on the file of the Sub-Court, Gingee, seeking a declaration that the Sale Deed executed by the appellant herein in favo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
