SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 72446

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA
M/s. L.E.F. Eden Garden Matriculation School – Appellant
Versus
Employee State Insurance Corporation – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.11.2025 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA and W.M.P.No.2514 of 2023 M/s.L.E.F.Eden Garden Matriculation School Rep. By its Correspondent Sri.G.J.Gyanaprakasam, 374, Cherry Road, Hasthampatty, Salem – 636 007. ...Petitioner -Vs-

1.Employee State Insurance Corporation, Rep. By its Dy.Regional Director, 39/57, Theerthamalai Vaniga Valagam, Three Roads, Salem – 636 009.

2.The Recovery Officer, Employee State Insurance Corporation, 39/57, Theerthamalai Vaniga Valagam, Three Roads, Salem – 636 009. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent under Section 45A of the ESI Act, 1948 dated 01.11.2022 in No.63000739910001302/INS-I/SRO/SLM/101/22 and quash the same and pass such further orders.

For Petitioner : M/s.Annie Singh For Respondents : Mrs.S.Jayakumari, Standing Counsel

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent under Section 45A of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) — No.63000739910001302/INS-I/SRO/SLM/101/22 dated

01.11.2022.

2. The petitioner is a private school established and administered by a registered religious charitable society. On 03.08.2011, the first respondent issued a C-18 (ad hoc) notice to the petitioner, demanding Rs.1,34,046/- towards ESI contribution for the period 29.12.2010 to 30.06.2011. Subsequently, by an interim order dated 31.01.2013 in W.M.P.No.1 of 2013 in W.A.No.222 of 2013, a Division Bench of this Court stayed the operation of G.O.Ms.No.237, Labour & Employment (K) dated 26.11.2010 insofar as it related to collection of ESI contributions from schools that are members of the Tamil Nadu Nursery, Primary, Matriculation, Higher Secondary & CBSE Schools Association. The petitioner is a member of that Association.

3. Relying on the aforesaid stay order of the Hon’ble Division Bench, the petitioner stopped payment of ESI contributions from February 2013 and informed the first respondent of the same through a representation dated 21.03.2016. Notwithstanding the currency of the stay order the first respondent passed an order under Section 45A of the ESI Act on 31.03.2016 (No. 63000739910001302/45A/347/11/INS/SRO/SLM) assessing the contribution at Rs.87,945/- for the period 01.03.2011 to 30.06.2011.

4. Thereafter, on 03.02.2022, the first respondent issued another show-

cause notice (No.63000739910001302/INS.II/SRO/SLM/SCN/D5/) proposing criminal prosecution against the petitioner for alleged non- payment of contributions for the periods 07/11 to 08/11 and 02/13 to 09/19. On 06.06.2022, the first respondent issued a further C-18 (ad hoc) notice seeking contributions based on assumed wages (regular contribution), totalling Rs.20,57,576/-.

5. Even though the petitioner requested reduction/waiver of the pending arrears. Instead, the first respondent rejected it and threatened the petitioner with distress proceedings. Finally, a 45-A order was passed on 01.11.2022, determining the arrears of contributions for the periods 01.07.2011 to 31.08.2011 and 01.02.2013 to 30.09.2019 at Rs.25,91,607/-. Aggrieved by the impugned 45-A order, the petitioner filed the above writ petition for the aforesaid relief.

6. When the matter was taken up for hearing on an earlier occasion, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondents had launched a New Amnesty Scheme, 2025 for settling pending Court cases, and that a communication dated 25.09.2025, was also sent to the petitioner inviting it to avail the scheme. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to obtain instructions.

7. Today, 26.11.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing in principle to settle the matter by availing the New Amnesty Scheme, 2025. However, the counsel requested that l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top