Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, JJ
The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
M.Mumoorthy (Deceased) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ order challenged on the grounds of legality. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments concerning the grounds for granting patta. (Para 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. presentation of evidence for patta claims. (Para 12 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. allegations of fraudulent documents to undermine claims. (Para 18 , 20) |
| 5. final order and conclusion reached. (Para 21) |
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
Under assail is the writ order dated 08.03.2022 made in W.P.No.26301 of 2009.
2. The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration along with his subordinate Revenue Authorities have preferred this intra-Court appeal mainly on the ground that the writ order setting aside the proceedings of the Special Commissioner and Commissioner for Land Administration dated 26.04.2005 is contrary to law and facts.
3. The facts in nutshell would show that the Kasapuram Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District was an Inam Village and was taken over by the Government under Tamil Nadu Inam Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963 (Tamil Nadu Act 26/63). During settlement, the lands in S.No.11/1 was treated as Government Dry Anadeenam by the Assistant S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
