SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 72912

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
S.MAHENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
THE INTERNAL OMBUDSMAN – Respondent


2025:MHC:2827 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL WA No. 2877 of 2023 and CMP No. 23969 of 2023 S.Mahendran

638011.

Appellant(s)

Vs

1.The Internal Ombudsman, Canara Bank, Head Office, No.112, J.C. Road, Bangalore – 560 002.

2.The Assistant General Manager, Office of the Banking Ombudsman, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai – 600 001.

3.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Srivilliputtur – 626 125.

Virudhunagar District.

4.The Banking Ombudsman, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai – 600 001.

Respondent(s)

PRAYER Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed by this Court dated 08.03.2023 made in WP.No.29492 of 2018 and allow the above writ appeal.

For Appellant(s): Mr.T.NarayanasamyGovernment Advocate For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Raghunathan For M/s.T.S.Gopalan And Co For R1 & R3 No Appearance For R2 & R4

JUDGMENT

(Judgment was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

The writ petitioner is the appellant before this Court. The relief sought for in the writ petition is relating to deposit made by the appellant in Canara Bank. It is a banking transaction and the interest c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top