Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Krishnan Ramasamy, J
K.Madhusudhanan – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar, O/o. The Sub Registrar, Dharapuram Tiruppur District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background includes ownership claims. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments on compliance with wakf act and property rights. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court observes limitation of jurisdiction under article 226. (Para 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. obligation to provide detailed gazette publishing. (Para 15 , 19 , 21) |
| 5. court orders registration of settlement deed. (Para 30) |
Order
The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order passed by the first respondent vide proceedings dated 16.05.2024 and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the first respondent to register the settlement deed presented by the petitioner on 26.07.2022 in favour of his wife and return back the Settlement Deed to the petitioner.
2. I have abbreviated the facts of the case by restricting it only to the relevant details:-
i) The Settlement Tahsildar, Coimbatore, vide order dated 15.11.1973, declared that one Lazum Huq, S/o Kazhi S.Sahul, is entitled to the grant of ryotwari patta, in respect of a property, comprised in S.No.407, measuring an extent of 36.42 acres of wet land situated at Alingiyam, Village, Dharapuram Taluk, The said order passed by the Settlement Tahsildar was challenged by the fourth responde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
