Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE
C.R. VINAYAGAM – Appellant
Versus
THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.11.2025 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W .P.No s . 4 0129, 39744 and 31970 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.45074, 46791, 35807 and 35810 of 2025 W.P.No.40129 of 2025:
C.R. Vinayagam S/o.Ranganathan, No.13/34, K.K.Street, Natham, Chengalpattu-603 002 Petitioner Vs
1.The Chief Election Commissioner Election Commission of India, Nirvanchan Sadhan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001
2.The State Election Commissioner Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009
3.The District Collector Office of the Collector, Chengalpattu-603 001
4.The Revenue Divisional Officer (Assistant Election Commissioner), Tambaram Constituency, Tambaram.
Respondents PRAYER i n W.P.No.40129 of 2025 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to remove disq
The court upheld that procedural compliance in voter registration processes is mandatory, denying bulk objections that lack proper individual submissions as per statutory requirements.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the self-contained nature of the Representation of People Act, 1951 and the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, and the availability of statutory....
Deletion from electoral rolls must comply with statutory procedures, and a petitioner must exhaust available remedies before seeking judicial review.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article