IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH K.Jayaprakash .... Petitioner Vs

1.The District Collector Chennai District Collector Office Chennai.

2.The Tahsildar Velacherry Taluk Having office at Taramani Chennai – 600 013. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation dated 20.09.2025 and to issue patta to the property of the petitioner comprised in Survey No.99/10A measuring an extent of 510 sq.ft., situated at Door No.18, Block No.1, Nethaji Nagar South Street, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041 forthwith without insisting “No Objection Certificate” from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board Department on the light of Gazetta Notification No.275 dated 08.08.1981 and pass orders.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Elumalai For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajesh Government Advocate for R1 & R2

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to issue patta to the petitioner with respect to the subject property.

2. Heard Mr.M.Elumalai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Rajesh, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents. 3. The request made by the petitioner seeking for patta has been rejected by the second respondent mainly on the ground that the patta can be issued only after getting 'No Objection Certificate' from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board.

4. The issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by earlier order of this Court dated 19.02.2025 in W.P.No.5387 of 2025 and relevant portions are extracted hereunder:

'3. A similar batch of writ petitions came to be filed before this Court and this Court passed an order dated 04.09.2017 made in WP.No.17484 to 17492 of 2017. For better understanding, the order is extracted hereunder:

“The petitioners have filed the above writ petitions to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent to process the petitioners' application dated 15.05.2017, 06.01.2016, 11.01.2016 and grant patta in respect of S.Nos.375, 373/2A respectively in Nerkundram Village, Maduravoyal Taluk, Tiruvallur District in favour of the petitioners without insisting No Objection Certificate from the second respondent within a time frame.

2. It is the case of the petitioners that originally Section

4(1) Notification was issued for acquisition of the lands on 11.06.1975 and 09.06.1978 in G.O.Rt.No.124 Housing, dated 08.05.1975 and G.O.Ms.Nos.996, 993, 994 Housing, dated 07.06.1978. Challenging the Notification issued under Section 4(1) and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, the land owner preferred writ petitions in W.P.Nos.8370 and 8371 of 1986 and the Division Bench of this Court, by order dated 21.01.1988 allowed the writ petitions and quashed the declaration under Section 6 of the Act and directed the authorities to conduct enquiry under Section 5A of the Act afresh.

3. Thereafter, the petitioner in W.P.No.8371 of 1986 preferred a writ petition in W.P.No.18379 of 1991 challenging Section 4(1) Notification dated 11.06.1995. This Court, by order dated 01.07.1999 quashed the Section 4(1) Notification dated 11.06.1975 and allowed the writ petition. In para 3 of the order passed in the said writ petition, this Court also recorded that the possession of the land was handed over to the Tamil Nadu Housing Board on 25.07.1986.

4. The petitioners, after their purchase from the original land owner, had applied for issuance of patta before the first respondent. The first respondent directed the petitioners to get No Objection Certificate from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board for the reason that the land was acquired by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that once Section 4(1) Notification has been quashed by this Court, the Housing Board has no right over the acquired lands.

Admittedly, neither the Housing Board nor the