IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN and WMP No.48977 of 2025 A.Thirumalai Petitioner Vs

1. Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Its Principal Secretary To Government Environment And Forests (FR-2)

Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests (Head Of Forest Force), Velachery Main Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032.

Respondents PRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records which culminated in issuing order passed by the 1st respondent in Letter No.21397/ FR.2(II) / 2016-4 dated 03.03.2017 and quash the same in so far as denial of monetary benefits for working period as forest watcher is concerned and directing the first respondent to pay monetary benefits from date of joining as forest watcher from 12.11.2010 till 03.03.2017 as per Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rule 27(17) and light of the order passed in W.P. No.23478 of 2023 dated 27.03.2024 same was implemented by the 1st respondent in G.O. (2D) No.55, Environment, Climate Change and Forests (FR.2(ii)) Department dated 26.03.2025.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Mani For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Selvaraj, AGP

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent dated 03.03.2017, thereby rejected the request made by the petitioner seeking monetary benefits from the date of his joining as Forest Watcher.

2. The petitioner was employed in the Forest Department as a Forest Guard. Prior to the regularization of his service, he had been engaged on a daily-wage basis. Subsequently, he was brought into the regular time scale of pay as a Forest Watcher, which is a cadre post. Thereafter, pursuant to the directions of this Court, the petitioner’s service was regularized as Forest Watcher with effect from 12.11.2010.

3. The specific case of the petitioner is that he has joined in the forest department on 01.09.1984 on daily wages. The petitioner and his juniors were included in the State wide seniority list drawn by the department by taking note of their date of joining in service on daily basis for bringing them into regular scale of pay of Forest Watcher. However, the seniority list was not maintained properly and the services of their juniors have been regularized on 24.01.1995.

Therefore, the petitioner and others submitted representation and it was not considered as such, they were constrained to approach this Court in W.P.No.3040 of 2014, and the same was allowed by this Court by an order dated

03.02.2014 and directed to regularize their services on par with juniors.

4. As directed by this Court, the government issued order vide letter No.21397/FR.2(II)/2016-4, dated 03.03.2017, thereby regularizing the petitioner and others’ services notionally from 24.01.1995 however granted monetary benefits from the date of issue of the order. It is contrary to the fundamental rules and they are entitled to get monetary benefits with effect from the date of joining as Forest Watcher as per F.R.27(17) of the Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules. It is relevant to extract the F.R. 27(17) of the Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules, as follows:-

“In case, where a government servant has been overlooked for promotion/appointment to the next higher post but subsequently promoted/appointed to that higher post after restoration of his original seniority on appeal, his pay shall be fixed on the date of assumption of charge in the higher post on par with the pay of his junior provided he has not drawn the same rate of pay as junior in the lower post from time to time. If he has not drawn the same rate of pay as his junior in the lower post, his pay shall be fixed, on the date assumption of charge, at the stage at which he would have drawn pay on that date had he been promoted/appointed to the higher post along with his junior. In cases where seniority has been restored on or after 19th S