IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR

1. V.Babu Appellant(s)

Vs

1. P.Thiyagarajan S/o.Ponnusamy Mo745, Tnhb Taj Nagar, Spb Colony Post, Erode Respondent(s)

For Appellant : Ms.T.Harshan Legal Aid Counsel For Respondent : Mr.M.Ganesh for Mr.N.Manokaran

ORDER

Today, the matter is listed under the caption “For Being Mentioned” at the instance of the learned Legal Aid Counsel for the appellant.

2.The learned Legal Aid Counsel for the appellant submitted that she has been appointed as Legal Aid Counsel by this Court vide order dated 24.09.2025 to represent the appellant. But in the order dated 22.10.2025, there is no mention about her preparation and strenuous argument and the payment of fee to the Legal Aid Counsel.

3.It is seen that Ms.T.Harshana has been appointed as Legal Aid Counsel on behalf of the appellant by this Court. In the order dated 22.10.2025, the payment payable to the Legal Aid Counsel has been omitted to be mentioned. Hence, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, High Court, Madras is directed to pay the fee to the Legal Aid Counsel as per the existing rules.

4.The Registry is directed to incorporate the