Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Orders No-Fault Vaccine Compensation Policy
11 Mar 2026
Delhi Sessions Court Upholds Conviction Under Sections 354, 354A IPC on Victim's Sole Reliable Testimony Despite No CCTV
11 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Seeks Dileep Response in 2017 Assault Appeal
11 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
S.KANNAIYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY ITS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and W.M.P.No.46780 of 2025
1.S.Kannaiyan
2.Manimaran
3.Kumaravel Pandian ….. Petitioners Vs
1.State of Tamilnadu rep by its Home(Police-III) Department, The Secretariat, Chennai-600 005.
2.Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.
3.The Chairman-Cum-Director General of Police, Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Campus, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. ….. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to recast all gradation as regards seniority and promotion in the post of direct recruit S.I of Police from the year 1995 based on selection process marks as mandated by the Supreme Court in the case of Ranjith Singh Vs State of Tamilnadu vide SLP(C) 5137-38 of 2021 dated 01
The petitioners were entitled to the benefit of FR 22-B, and the respondent authorities were directed to re-fix the scale of pay of the petitioners by giving them the benefit of FR 22-B.
The petitioner was entitled to notional seniority on par with the 2008 batch of Sub-Inspectors of Police based on previous orders of the Tribunal and the High Court, as well as a Supreme Court preced....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article