SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 73841

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice C. SARAVANAN
C Sowmya Raga – Appellant
Versus
The Tax Recovery Officer 3 – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.11.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.46782 and 46784 of 2025 C.Sowmya Raga ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Tax Recovery Officer – 3 Income Tax Department, No.121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034.

2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Chennai, Income Tax Department, No.121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034.

3.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Chennai, Income Tax Department, No.121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Writ Petitioner on the file of the 1st Respondent to quash the impugned communication dated 21.10.2025 in DIN & Letter No: ITBA/COM/F/17/2025-26/1081903214(1) seeking possession of the property sought to be auctioned and the auction notice dated 25.09.2025 located at No.238/4, 238/5C, Mevalurkuppam Main Road, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram, Chennai – 602 117 and the auction notice dated 25.09.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Sriraman For Respondents : Mrs.S.Premalatha Senior Standing Counsel

ORDER

Mrs.S.Premalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice for the Respondents.

2. The Petitioner is before this Court against the impugned auction notice dated 25.09.2025. By the impugned auction notice, the auction was to be held on 28.10.2025 at 11.00 am.

3. The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents submits that indeed auction was held on 28.10.2025 and the successful bidder has also sought time for depositing the balance amount. It is noticed that earlier the Petitioner had approached this Court in W.P.No.28774 of 2019, wherein, the Petitioner had prayed for a mandamus to direct the 2nd Respondent / Sub- Registrar to remove the attachment entry made by the 3rd Respondent / Tax Recovery Officer over the immovable property measuring 67 cents comprised in Survey No.238/4 (65 cents) and Survey No.238/5C (2 cents) situated at Mevalurkuppam Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and to direct the 2nd Respondent / Sub-Registrar to make appropriate entries stating that the said attachment has been lifted and to allow the Petitioner to enjoy the property without any hindrance.

4. By an Order dated 23.02.2024, the Writ Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the Writ Petitioner with the following observations:-

“... 7. Admittedly, the fourth respondent is the original owner of the property and there was a complaint against the fourth respondent before the CBI and they have also conducted raid on 16.12.2010 and they have also requested the investigation wing of the third respondent to investigate regarding the evasion of the Income Tax. They have also issued summons on 17.02.2011 under Section 131 of the Income Tax Act and issued scrutiny notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 on 30.09.2011. Subsequently, the petitioner purchased the land from the fourth respondent only on 02.11.2011. Later, summons were issued by the third respondent and therefore, the transaction made by the fourth respondent is void. Since the sale made by the fourth respondent in favour of the petitioner is not valid one, the petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought for in the Writ Petition.

5. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the Writ Petition, the Petitioner had approached the Division Bench of this Court by way of an appeal in W.A.No.1518 of 2024. The Division Bench of this Court by an order dated

10.09.2025 disposed of the appeal with the following observations:-

“17. In the light of the above discussion, we find no ground to interfere with the conclusion arrived by the Writ Court in the Impugned Order dated 23.02.2024 in W.P.No.28774 of 2019.

18. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is liable to be dismissed.

Liberty is however given to the Appellant / Writ Petitioner to file a civil suit to declare that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top