T .V.THAMILSELVI, J .

Today, this Criminal Revision Case is listed under the caption, “For Being Mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the petitioner is Accused No.3 in Crime No.34 of 2025 on the file of respondent Police. However, in Paragraph No.2 of the Order dated 25.09.2025 in Crl.R.C.No.1832 of 2025, the said Crime Number has been wrongly typed as Crime No.302 of 2025, instead of, Crime No.34 of 2025. Therefore, the learned counsel for petitioner prayed that the said typographical error may be rectified.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing on behalf of respondent Police submitted that he has no serious objection for rectifying the aforesaid typographical error crept-in in Paragraph No.2 of the Order dated 25.09.2025 in Crl.R.C.No.1832 of 2025 passed by this Court.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to rectify the typographical error crept-in in Paragraph No.2 of the Order dated 25.09.2025 in Crl.R.C.No.1832 of 2025. Accordingly, the same is rectified and 1st three lines in Paragraph No.2 of the said order reads as follows:

“2. The petitioner is arrayed as A3 in Crime No.34 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 18(c) r/w. 22(b), 25, 29(1) of NDPS Act and under Sec.77 of Juvenile Justice Care and Protection of Children Act, 2015.”

5. In all other aspects, Order dated 25.09.2025 in Crl.R.C.No.1832 of

2025 shall remain unaltered. Registry is directed to issue a fresh order copy to all concerned, after carrying out the aforesaid correction.

30.10.2025 mrr Index: Yes/No Speaking Order (or) Non-Speaking Order T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

mrr

30.10.2025 DATED: 25-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Karthick S/o. Sekkar TD, Residing at No.2/156, 6th Street, RR Nagar, Paraniputhur, Kancheepuram-600 037.

Petitioner(s)

Vs The State Rep By The Inspector Of Police R-9, Valasaravakkam Police Station, Chennai.

Respondent(s)

PRAYER To call for the records relating to the order passed in Crl.M.P. No.3306 of 2025 dated 27.06.2025 on the file of the Learned Secession Judge I Additional, Special Court for EC and NDPS Chennai set aside the order same.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.Teja R.

For Respondent(s): Dr.C.E.Pratap, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the order dated 27.06.2025 passed in Crl.M.P. No.3306 of 2025 by the Sessions Judge I Addl. Special Court for EC and NDPS Act, Chennai, thereby dismissing the petition filed for return of the property, viz., a POCO Mobile phone, OPPO mobile phone and Yamaha Ray Scooter bearing Regn. No. TN-10 BP 1374 and cash of Rs.35,000/-, which was seized by the respondent police.

2. The petitioner is arrayed as A3 in Crime No.302 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 18(c) r/w 22(b), 25, 29(1) of NDPS Act and under Sec.77 of Juvenile Justice Care and Protection of Children Act, 2015. Pursuant to the registration of the FIR, the respondent police seized the petitioner's mobile phones, two-wheeler and cash and produced the same before the Trial Court. Therefore, the petitioner filed a petition seeking return of the property. However, the same was dismissed on the ground that the mobile phones would be a digital evidence and would be of immense use in proving guilt and no sufficient documents produced by him to show his ownership of cash.

3. The learned counsel for petitioner would submit that he is a Zomato boy and he is owner of the property and he was falsely implicated in this case.

Hence, he prayed to return of property seized by the respondent police.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for respondent raised objections for return of property and as on date, final report was filed.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials av