Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice N.SENTHILKUMAR
S Sudhakar and 4 others – Appellant
Versus
Sri Narasus Coffee Company Private Limited – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.S(COMM DIV) NO. 203 OF 2024 and A NO. 4331 to 4334 of 2025 & A NO.4754 OF 2025 and OP(TM) No. 62 of 2024
1. S.Sudhakar
2. S.Dhinakar
3. M/s.T.M.Karuppiah Nadar Sons No.84, M.C.Road, Old Washermenpet, Chennai 600 021.
Represented by its Partner S.Sudhakar
4. M/s.Shri Lakshmi Agri Foods, No.10, N.N.Garden, 10th Street, Chennai 600 021 Rep. By its Partner, Mr.S.Sudhakar
5. Shri Lakshmi Agro Foods Pvt. Ltd., No.9, N.N.Garden, 10th Street, Chennai 600 021.
Rep. By its Managing Director, S.Sudhakar ….Plaintiff/Petitioners Vs.
Sri Narasus Coffee Co. Pvt. Ltd., No.16, Court Road, Johnsonpet, Salem 636 007.
Represented by its Managing Director.
….Defendant/Respondent in C.S(COMM DIV) NO.
203 OF 2024
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the plaintiff to a permanent injunction for passing off its mark 'SANDHI SUDHA' and the consideration of the defendants' non-rep....
The court affirmed that prior use of a registered trademark provides substantial grounds for an injunction against similar marks, emphasizing deceptive similarity effects on consumer perception.
An interim injunction requires a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable injury, which were not established by the plaintiff.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article