SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 74001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
Anbu.K – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.(MD)No.22882 of 2023 AND W.M.P.(MD)No.19126 of 2023 K.Anbu ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

3. The Tahsildar, Thiruvidaimaruthur, Thanjavur District.

4. The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai.

5. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Govindapuram, Thiruvidaimaruthur Taluk, 6. The Forest Officer, (R-6 is deleted vide order dated 25.09.2025 in W.M.P.(MD)No.18260 of 2024)

7. The President, Adudurai, Thiruvidaimaruthur Taluk, Thanjavur District.

8. Selvanami

9. Singari Mami

10.Subbuni @ Subramaniya Ayyar

11. Ramakrishnan

12.Murugavel ... Respondents 8 to 12 encroachers in Pillaiyarkulam Tank

13. Manickam

14. Kumaran

15. S.L.Narayanan

16. Rajagopal 17. Rajendran

18. Lakshmanan

19. Rajalingamoorthy

20. Selvakumar

21. Anbu 22. Rajam

23. Abbu @ Mathavan

24. Saravanababu

25. Mathavan

26. Gangadharan

27. Ravi

28. Palani

29. Sivagnana Sampanthan @ Adurar Ayyar

30. Uma

31. Kaipillai @ Raja

32. Rajaraman

33. Ramamirtham

34. Karthi

35. Komala ... Respondents 13 to 35 encroachers in Pappakulam Tank

36. The Executive Officer, Town Panchayat, Aaduthurai, Thiruvidaimaruthoor Taluk, Thanjavur District.

(R-36 is suo motu impleaded vide order dated 25.09.2025) ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, issuing a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 6 to remove the encroachment made by respondents 8 to 36 in the interest of the general public of Melamaruthuvakudi Village and to protect the tanks situated in Melamaruthuvakudi. The tank namely Nagalkulam comprised in survey Nos.364, measuring an extent of 1/57 ares, the tank namely Pillaiyarkulam comprised in survey No.181/5 measuring an extent of 0.42.5 ares, the tank namely Pappakulam comprised in survey No.236/4 measuring an extent of 0.02.11 ares and the tank namely Thattarakulam comprised in No.442/33 measuring an extent of 0.37.0 within a time frame fixed by this Court and restore the same in its entirety.

For Petitioner : Mr.I.Velpradeep For R-1 to R-6 : Mr.M.Gangatharan, Government Advocate.

For R-9toR-13, R14,R21,R-22&R29 : No appearance.

* * *

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents.

2. The petitioner is a resident of Melamaruthuvakudi Village.

The petitioner alleges that in the petition-mentioned survey numbers, there are encroachments and illegal constructions.

3. The learned Government Advocate on written instructions confirms that the petition-mentioned survey numbers have been classified as water bodies. Once this factual aspect is conceded, the consequences have to follow. If any illegal construction had been put up in the petition-mentioned water bodies, the same will have to be necessarily removed. The only concession that can be given is time to vacate. It is stated that notices have already been issued. This process has to be taken to its logical conclusion. Within a period of six months, all the encroachments in the petition-mentioned water body shall be removed and the water body shall be restored to its original condition. Survey No.364 is admittedly a water body and an indoor stadium had been constructed in the year 2022-23. We can only express our surprise and shock that in the year 2023-23, a water body had been allowed to be converted into a sports stadium. That it was put up by using MP funds cannot be a consideration. It shall also be removed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. We remind the respondents that the Hon'ble First Bench recently passed the following order in W.P.29422 of 2025 (Prakasam Vs. The District Collector Mayiladuthurai District) vide order dated 08.10.2025:-

“4. We find that, in ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top